no one’s ever hated courtney love
I’m making this into an official Top Topics link so you all get it. This is also the final time I’m going to ever explain this by itself. If you’re new and you’re interested in unlearning shit, you have a responsibility to give a fuck about the information that is here. If you just want to be gaslighty and try to find ‘selective instances you think are questionable’ to derail shit, even though contextual/hard-evidence tells you otherwise, I’m not interested. This blog was made for all of you to pick through and read and unlearn shit on your own time. Do the work. For this reason anything derail-y or gaslighty will be deleted and or blocked on sight depending on the level of defensiveness in the ask.
Courtney Love has never, in the history of her career, ever been hated by anyone in the media.
Its because Courtney Love’s image is based on people hating her and then her gauging and nurturing that so she can play victim and create support from both sides of the fence. It’s a WIN-WIN. And this is why -
If it’s negative in a sexist/ignorant/bigoted way, it condones her image and it works for her. If she’s a ‘bitch’ or a ‘slut’ it works for her.
If it’s negative in a ‘she’s mouthy/too much to handle’ way, it condones her image and it works for her. ‘Crazy’ and ‘wild’ and ‘brash/volatile’ Courtney works for her.
If it’s conspiracy Tom Grant/Hank Harrison/MKUltra based, it condones her image and it works for her. The conspiracy was also invented her her and her pr team for this reason (x). Pay attention to everything there until mid July 2016 for this specific information.
If it’s painting her as a ‘bad mother’ or accuses her of raising/giving birth a to a ‘drug baby,’ those publications, on record, are ones that she’s usually hired journalists to write herself. Also the image works for her. Even though there’s a living, breathing person involved (Frances), it works for her. I will update this with a link to my drug article I’m finishing with the journalists I’ve exposed in this regard. ***
If they call her ‘manipulative’ or a ‘harpy,’ it condones her image and works for her. Her interview with SPIN in 98 is a perfect example of this in print. Her and the journalist discuss how that works for her and you also see it in MOTION. See pages 93-98 (you have to scroll up) [x]. You see how you get fooled into thinking that despite everything, perceiving her as manipulative just works in her favor. Abusive’s a whole nother’ story, but the manipulative aspect is a gold mine. Because then it becomes perceived as her just working the industry as a strong independent woman and it’s no longer a bad thing to be manipulative.
1 - Courtney’s never been genuinely hated and that’s a myth (x) I’ve gone into much detail to with links and sources and research all in one go
2 - If there was actually any fan-hate, it was influenced by the fact that Courtney’s image is based on creating that sort of publicity anyway, so any ‘fan hate’ is actually a positive thing for her because she gets to sell a shtick and people keep talking about her either way
3 - She’s a liar and an abuser period. See the Top Topics. She’s horribly bigoted and abusive and just an all around not-nice person. If you read through the Psychology of Abuse tag you’ll learn how abusers operate and what to expect.
4 - Courtney applied aforementioned abusive methods to trap and abuse Kurt in their relationship and the largest aspect of it came from her creating falsehoods like that that seemed realistic so he would think he had to protect her in some way and forget/stay ignorant of his own abuse. The Psychology of Abuse tag exists for this reason, see Top Topics.
Courtney’s entire image from late 80s to present has been based on creating a negative!-positive shtick where she deliberately pays journalists/publications to embellish that people hate her when they don’t. Then because she routinely says in every interview she has that people ‘hate’ her, combined with her headline planting that they do, people…believe…. that she’s hated when she’s not.
Also there is no publication at all in the entire history of the 90s prior to Kurt’s death that was negative towards her.
At all. If you actually go look at old google-news scans of papers and concert reviews and think-pieces and tabloids made about Courtney, esp for that time period, every single one of them is disturbingly positive or they co-sign an aspect of her shtick in some way. It’s always complimentary. Not to mention if you go through the old MoonWashedRose scans and see the general body of major publications written about her. It is ALWAYS positive or they embrace an aspect of her image that’s been cooked up by her to sell papers.
Even the supposedly ‘negative’ tabloids, which I have scans of, about her from the early 2000′s during her fake drug-binge shtick still EMBRACE her image that she’s ‘kooky’ and there’s ‘something wrong with her.’
With that said, quite literally every single publication about her..coverage of her..fan accounts..general..public..accounts and perception if you dive into that old-ass history is positive of her even if its NEGATIVE.
People ‘hating’ Courtney, whether its conspiracy related, or for whatever reason, is not real and has never been a thing. There are no select instances of something seeming real or her seeming like a decent person who was victimized. It does not exist. This . is. not . a . thing. This is also how she WANTS you to protect her as an ABUSER.